- Ce sujet est vide.
Vous lisez 0 fil de discussion
-
Messages
-
-
Confirmed LC vs Credit Insurance: Which is cheaper & safer for exporters?
Direct, mobile-first guide to choose between LC confirmation and credit insurance for risk cover and faster cash. Includes a ready-to-use request template.
⏱️ 5–15 biz days
🏦 A / BBB banks
📑 UCP 600 • ISBPDo not post IBAN or confidential data publicly. Use the secure form.
🎯 Executive summary
Confirmed LC (UCP 600)
- Bank-to-bank risk cover if the issuing bank/country worries you.
- Payment “mechanical” on document compliance (ISBP rules).
- Often easier to discount/forfait for immediate cash.
Credit Insurance (policy)
- Protects receivables against buyer default/political risk.
- Need credit limits + waiting period + claim process.
- Pairs well with open account programs & factoring.
📦 Documents: ISBP
🚚 Incoterms®
🔐 KYC/AML📊 Side-by-side comparison
Dimension Confirmed LC Credit Insurance Who should favor it? Risk cover trigger Document compliance; confirming bank pays Buyer default/non-payment after waiting period LC: doc-heavy trades • Insurance: open account Speed to cash Easy discount/forfaiting at bank Depends on factor/bank and policy terms Need cash fast → LC confirmation Total cost Issuance + advising + confirmation spread Annual/transaction premium rate Compare spreads vs premiums per country/risk Admin LC wording + documents under UCP/ISBP Limits, declarations, overdue reporting Lean teams → LC (bank handles docs) Political risk Covered via confirming bank Covered if included in policy High-risk geographies → both can work Scalability Deal by deal Portfolio-wide (buyers/countries) Many buyers → insurance shines Monetization Strong (discounting/forfaiting) Good (insured receivable factoring) Bank relationships decide pricing Costs vary by rating, country risk, amount, tenor, and wording/policy terms.
🧭 Quick decision rules
- If your trade is document-centric (BL, inspection, certs) → Confirmed LC.
- If you sell on open account with many buyers → Credit insurance.
- Need immediate cash? Confirmation + discounting often wins on speed.
- Portfolio hedging? Insurance reduces volatility across many invoices.
Blend: Some exporters use insurance for most buyers and switch to confirmed LC for higher-risk or large one-off deals.🧮 Worked example (90–120 days)
Option A — Confirmed LC (120d)
- Costs: issuance + advising + confirmation spread.
- Cash: discount at confirmation bank, same week.
- Risk: documentary compliance (manage via ISBP).
Option B — Credit Insurance + OA (120d)
- Costs: annual/transaction premium.
- Cash: factor the insured receivable.
- Risk: claim process & waiting period apply.
⚠️ Frequent mistakes
- Requesting confirmation when the issuer is already AA and local risk is low.
- Buying insurance without securing buyer limits in advance.
- Ignoring Incoterms® vs required insurance/transport docs.
- Not aligning tenor (90/120/180d) with production/transport lead-times.
📝 Copy/paste request template
Role: Exporter
Subject: Compare confirmed LC vs credit insurance for Buyer X (Country Y)
Deal size & currency: ____ / ____
Tenor: 90/120/180 days
Incoterms®: ____ / Route: ____
Issuing bank (if LC): ____ / Rating: ____
Insurance market (if policy): target limit per buyer = ____
Docs available: Contract, Proforma, draft MT700, invoices, BL/inspection
Target timing: ____ • Cash need: ____
Constraints: sanctions, country cap, policy waiting period, etc.Standards: KYC/AML • UCP 600 • ISBP • Incoterms® • Credit Insurance T&Cs
-
Vous lisez 0 fil de discussion
- Vous devez être connecté pour répondre à ce sujet.