TTT vs TTV vs CIF: The Truth Brokers Don’t Tell Buyers

  • Auteur/autrice de la publication :
  • Post category:Uncategorized
  • Commentaires de la publication :0 commentaire

TTT vs TTV vs CIF: The Truth Brokers Don’t Tell Buyers

How to avoid $500,000–$5,000,000 losses in EN590 diesel and Jet A-1 fuel transactions by understanding real delivery structures.


Introduction — Where Most Buyers Lose Millions

In global fuel trading, losses rarely come from price volatility. They come from misunderstood delivery terms. TTT, TTV, and CIF are often presented as interchangeable options by brokers — they are not.

Every year, buyers lose hundreds of millions of dollars because they enter EN590 and Jet A-1 deals without understanding who controls the fuel, when ownership transfers, and where the risk truly sits.

This article exposes the structural truth behind TTT, TTV, and CIF — and why misunderstanding them leads directly to catastrophic losses.


1. Why Brokers Blur Delivery Structures

Most intermediaries are not operational traders. They sell documents, not fuel. By blurring delivery structures, they:

  • Create artificial flexibility
  • Avoid accountability
  • Shift risk entirely to the buyer

Professional sellers never blur terms. Only brokers do.


2. TTT (Tank-to-Tank): The Most Misused Term in Fuel Trading

What TTT Really Means

TTT means:

  • Fuel is already physically stored in a terminal tank
  • The seller controls that tank
  • Ownership transfers inside the terminal

No vessel. No voyage. No excuses.

The Hidden Reality

90% of “TTT offers” fail because:

  • The seller does not control the tank
  • The fuel exists only on paper
  • The terminal does not recognize the seller

If inspectors cannot access the tank, it is not TTT.

Where Buyers Lose Millions

Buyers pay inspection or commitment fees believing fuel is present — only to discover there is no transferable inventory.


3. TTV (Tank-to-Vessel): The Gray Zone Most Buyers Don’t Understand

What TTV Actually Is

TTV means:

  • Fuel is loaded from terminal tank to buyer-nominated vessel
  • Title transfers during or after loading
  • Marine logistics are required

The Risk Buyers Ignore

  • Vessel nomination failures
  • Port delays and demurrage
  • Insurance and title ambiguity

TTV requires operational experience — not just capital.

Common Broker Deception

Brokers often market TTV as “almost TTT.” It is not. Once a vessel is involved, risk multiplies.


4. CIF: The Illusion of Safety

What CIF Really Means

Cost, Insurance, and Freight (CIF) means:

  • Seller arranges transport to destination port
  • Risk transfers when cargo is loaded
  • Buyer pays upon agreed documentation

Why Buyers Feel “Protected”

CIF sounds safer because:

  • Delivery feels guaranteed
  • Seller handles logistics

The Hidden Trap

Most CIF fraud happens before loading:

  • Non-existent vessels
  • Fake shipping schedules
  • Forged bills of lading

If the cargo never loads, CIF protections are meaningless.


5. Comparison Table: What Brokers Won’t Show You

  • TTT: Lowest logistics risk, highest verification requirement
  • TTV: Medium risk, high operational complexity
  • CIF: High documentation risk, delayed visibility

6. EN590 & Jet A-1: Why These Products Magnify Risk

EN590 diesel and Jet A-1 are:

  • Highly regulated
  • Terminal-controlled
  • Inspection-intensive

Any mismatch between delivery term and reality is exposed instantly by SGS, Intertek, or Bureau Veritas.


7. The $500K–$5M Loss Pattern

Losses follow a predictable pattern:

  1. Buyer accepts wrong delivery structure
  2. Buyer pays fees or issues financial instrument
  3. Inspection or loading fails
  4. Funds are locked or unrecoverable

The problem is not price. It is structure.


8. How Real Buyers Protect Themselves

  • They verify tank control, not documents
  • They align delivery terms with terminal rules
  • They reject hybrid or invented structures
  • They involve inspectors before committing funds

FAQ — Delivery Terms Reality Check

  1. Which is safest: TTT, TTV, or CIF?
    TTT is safest only when tank control is real.
  2. Can TTV be converted to TTT?
    No. They are structurally different.
  3. Is CIF always risky?
    CIF is safe only with verified loading proof.
  4. Why do brokers avoid explaining this?
    Because clarity eliminates weak offers.
  5. What is the biggest buyer mistake?
    Believing delivery terms are interchangeable.

Conclusion — Structure Is Everything

In EN590 and Jet A-1 trading, delivery terms are not semantics — they are the deal. Most losses occur not because buyers are unlucky, but because they are misinformed.

When you understand TTT, TTV, and CIF clearly, fraud collapses and real opportunities remain.

The market does not punish buyers for being cautious. It punishes them for being ignorant.

Laisser un commentaire