Introduction

In Documentary Letters of Credit (DLC) transactions, precision in documentation is critical. Any deviation — known as a discrepancy — can lead to delayed payments, document rejection, or even transaction failure.

Effectively handling such discrepancies requires clear communication, strict procedural adherence, and an understanding of dispute resolution mechanisms under trade finance law.

Keywords: discrepancy handling, document rejection, arbitration, negotiation, trade finance dispute resolution
Related terms: UCP 600 Article 16, non-compliance management, documentary examination, discrepancy notice

---

I. Understanding Documentary Credit Discrepancies

A discrepancy arises when documents presented under a DLC do not conform to the terms and conditions specified in the credit.

Common examples include:

• Mismatched shipment dates or quantities

• Incorrect beneficiary or consignee details

• Missing or expired documents (e.g., bill of lading, insurance certificate)

• Inconsistent data across invoices, certificates, and transport documents

Banks must examine documents strictly on their face, and even minor errors can trigger a notice of refusal under UCP 600 regulations.

---

II. Bank’s Role in Identifying and Notifying Discrepancies

Under UCP 600 Article 14 and 16, banks have a maximum of five banking days to:

1. Examine documents presented under the LC.

2. Identify any discrepancies.

3. Notify the presenting party (beneficiary) of document rejection or conditional acceptance.

The issuing bank or confirming bank must provide a detailed discrepancy notice, specifying:

• The reasons for rejection

• The rights of the presenter to correct or replace documents

• The timeframe for resubmission or negotiation

Failure to notify within this period obligates the bank to honor the LC, even if discrepancies exist.

---

III. Options for Resolving Documentary Discrepancies

When discrepancies are found, several resolution methods are available depending on the severity and nature of the error:

1. Negotiation and Waiver

The issuing bank may contact the applicant (buyer) to seek a waiver of discrepancies.
If the buyer accepts the documents “as is,” payment can proceed without amendment.

2. Correction and Resubmission

The beneficiary may correct the documents and resubmit within the LC validity period.
This is common when discrepancies are minor (e.g., missing signature or typographical errors).

3. LC Amendment

In cases where correction is not possible, an LC amendment can be issued by the applicant through the issuing bank to align the credit terms with the presented documents.

4. Rejection and Return

If discrepancies are material and cannot be resolved, the documents are formally refused and returned to the beneficiary with a discrepancy list.

---

IV. Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Trade Finance

When negotiation fails, formal dispute resolution methods apply:

1. Arbitration

Many LC contracts include arbitration clauses specifying venues such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
Arbitration provides a faster, confidential alternative to court litigation for cross-border trade disputes.

2. Mediation

Parties may engage in amicable mediation to reach a mutually beneficial settlement, often facilitated by trade finance specialists or neutral mediators.

3. Litigation

As a last resort, disputes may escalate to court proceedings in the jurisdiction governing the LC.
This process is typically slower and costlier but ensures legal enforceability of judgments.

---

V. Preventive Measures to Avoid Discrepancies

Preventing discrepancies is more efficient than resolving them. Exporters and importers can minimize risk through:

1. Pre-checking documents before submission against LC terms.

2. Using professional freight forwarders and inspection agencies for accuracy.

3. Implementing electronic document systems (eUCP) to reduce human error.

4. Engaging trade finance advisors or confirming banks early in the transaction.

5. Training export staff on UCP 600 and ISP98 documentation standards.

---

VI. Practical Case — Resolving a Discrepant Shipment Invoice

An exporter presented documents where the invoice value exceeded the LC amount by USD 1,200.
The confirming bank issued a discrepancy notice within two business days.
After negotiation, the buyer waived the discrepancy, allowing payment under the LC terms.

This example illustrates the importance of timely communication and cooperation among parties to resolve issues without litigation.

---

Conclusion

Handling documentary credit discrepancies requires legal precision, procedural discipline, and commercial flexibility.

By understanding the roles of banks, dispute resolution pathways, and preventive practices, traders can:

• Avoid unnecessary payment delays

• Protect financial interests

• Maintain trust and continuity in trade relationships

Effective discrepancy management strengthens global trade operations by ensuring fairness, transparency, and compliance in every transaction.

---

FAQ — Dispute and Resolution of Documentary Credit Discrepancies

Q1 — What happens if discrepancies are found in LC documents?
The bank issues a formal discrepancy notice and may reject or hold documents pending applicant approval.

Q2 — Can discrepancies be waived?
Yes. The applicant (buyer) can authorize the bank to accept documents “as presented.”

Q3 — What if a bank fails to notify within five days?
Under UCP 600 Article 16, the bank is deemed to have accepted the documents and must pay.

Q4 — Who settles disputes if parties disagree?
Disputes are typically resolved through negotiation, arbitration, or court proceedings under the LC’s governing law.

Q5 — How can exporters avoid discrepancies?
By double-checking all documents, understanding LC clauses, and complying strictly with the LC’s terms.