Introduction — Buyers Don’t Know Which Procedure Is “Real” (And That’s Why Deals Collapse)
In 2025, EN590 & Jet A1 buyers are flooded with competing procedures:
FOB (Free On Board)
CIF (Cost, Insurance & Freight)
TTT (Tank-to-Tank)
TTV (Tank-to-Vessel)
But most buyers don’t know which is safe, which is institutional, and which is used by real refineries, tank farms, and title holders.
This confusion creates:
Misaligned procedures
Fake seller exposure
Endless negotiation loops
Requests that violate terminal rules
Buyer frustration and deal failure
This article provides the full institutional breakdown of each method, explains which procedure is safest, and shows how NNRV structures real transactions.
SECTION 1 — Understanding the Context (Macro + Industry)
1.1 The Global Market Has Zero Tolerance for Improvised Procedures
Refineries, terminals, and vessel operators follow strict rules:
Incoterms 2020
IFC port regulations
ISPS vessel security
FATF AML & Basel III
Tank farm operational laws
SGS/Intertek Q&Q protocols
SWIFT-based POF and payment standards
Any petroleum procedure must comply with these frameworks.
Anything outside these rules = fake seller procedure.
1.2 Why Procedures Matter More Than Price
A good buyer will lose their deal if they:
Ask for the wrong procedure
Request actions that violate terminal rules
Demand POP at the wrong time
Reject the seller’s mandated method
Mix CIF/FOB/TTT steps incorrectly
Many buyers mistakenly think:
“Price is the most important part.”
Wrong.
Procedure determines whether the deal exists at all.
1.3 The 2025 Rule
👉 In 2025, procedures define credibility.
👉 The safest procedure = the one fully controlled by secured logistics + terminal compliance.
This is why some procedures are inherently safer than others.
SECTION 2 — Full Explanation of the 4 Procedures (A to Z)

Let’s break down each procedure technically and institutionally.
⚓ 1. FOB — Free On Board (Loading at Seller’s Port)
Definition
The seller loads the product on the buyer’s vessel at the designated port (Rotterdam, Houston, Novorossiysk, Kuwait, etc.).
Who Controls Logistics?
Seller → tank, port logistics, loading
Buyer → vessel, freight, insurance
Payment Structure
MT103 after Q&Q
OR LC/SBLC MT700/MT760
OR escrow depending on seller
POP Timing
Partial POP after SPA, full POP at loading.
Advantages
Lowest premium
Transparent
Seller carries loading risk
Ideal for large buyers with vessel control
Risks
Buyer must secure vessel
Port congestion risk
Weather delays
Who Uses FOB?
Refineries
Terminal allocators
Major suppliers
🟩 FOB = Safe if buyer has vessel + institutional bank
⚓ 2. CIF — Cost, Insurance & Freight (Delivered to Buyer’s Port)
Definition
Seller ships cargo to buyer’s port (e.g., Lagos, Tema, Jebel Ali).
Who Controls Logistics?
Seller controls vessel, freight, insurance
Buyer receives at destination
Payment Structure
Typically LC MT700 or SBLC MT760 (strict).
POP Timing
POP at loading + vessel tracking.
Advantages
Good for less experienced buyers
Seller manages freight
Lower operational burden for buyer
Risks
High premium
Requires strong seller
LC must be flawless
High fraud exposure if seller is not refinery-aligned
Who Uses CIF?
Sellers with large export quotas
Government contracts
Institutional buyers
🟨 CIF = Safe but ONLY with real refinery-backed sellers
⚓ 3. TTT — Tank-to-Tank (Local Transfer at Terminal)
Definition
Product is transferred from seller’s tank → buyer’s tank in the same terminal (Rotterdam, Fujairah, Jurong, Houston).
POP Requirement
POP → DTA → DIP test → Q&Q → Title Transfer
Who Controls Logistics?
Terminal
Seller logistics
Buyer tank farm
Advantages
Product verified physically
DIP test before payment
No vessel required
Extremely secure
Low risk of fraud
Risks
Tank availability
Buyer must have own tank
Terminal scheduling delays
Who Uses TTT?
Professional buyers
Traders with tank contracts
Fuel distributors with inventory rotation
🟩 TTT = Safest procedure in the world (institutional standard)
⚓ 4. TTV — Tank-to-Vessel (Seller’s Tank → Buyer’s Charter Vessel)
Definition
Product moves from tank to buyer’s vessel at terminal.
POP Requirement
Same as TTT, but buyer must charter vessel.
Advantages
DIP test before loading
Vessel control advantage
Lower premium than CIF
Risks
Vessel nomination
Demurrage risk
Terminal delays
Requires buyer marine expertise
Who Uses TTV?
Experienced traders
Buyers with steady maritime operations
🟩 TTV = Very safe (nearly as secure as TTT)
SECTION 3 — NNRV Professional Analysis: Which Procedure Is Actually Safest?
Ranked from Most Safe → Least Safe:
| Rank | Procedure | Safety Level | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TTT | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | DIP test before payment, terminal control |
| 2 | TTV | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | DIP + vessel control |
| 3 | FOB | ⭐⭐⭐ | SPA + POP + Q&Q at loading |
| 4 | CIF | ⭐⭐ | Heavy fraud exposure, LC risk, depends on seller logistics |
Why TTT Is the Safest
Buyer sees the product before payment
DIP test results verified
Terminal (Vopak/Oiltanking/VTTI) acts as third-party safeguard
No vessel delays
No delivery risk
No insurance manipulation
TTT is the preferred method for:
Major traders
Real title holders
Institutional allocations
Banks monetizing SBLC-backed inventory
Why CIF Is the Most Dangerous (Unless Seller Is Real)
CIF is legitimate but high-risk because:
Fraudsters love it
LC can be manipulated
No DIP test before loading
Buyer cannot verify product at origin
Freight and insurance costs can be inflated
NNRV only recommends CIF with:
Known refineries
Long-term allocation sellers
Government or corporate deals
Why FOB Is Often the Most Misunderstood
FOB is safe but buyers misunderstand the vessel burden:
Vessel nomination
NOR
ETD/ETA
Charter party compliance
Marine insurance
FOB requires experienced maritime operations.
SECTION 4 — Step-by-Step Comparison Timeline (Day 1–30)
FOB Timeline
ICPO → SCO
SPA
Partial POP
Buyer vessel arrives
Q&Q
MT103
Loading
CIF Timeline
ICPO → SCO
SPA + LC MT700
Partial POP
Vessel loading
Freight to buyer
CI + MT103
Discharge
TTT Timeline
ICPO
SPA
Partial POP
DTA
DIP test
MT103
Tank transfer
TTV Timeline
ICPO
SPA
Partial POP
DTA
DIP test
Buyer vessel arrives
Loading
SECTION 5 — Buyer & Seller Questions (20 Total)
10 Buyer Questions
Which procedure gives DIP test before payment? (TTT/TTV)
Which method is cheapest? (FOB)
Which method is most secure? (TTT)
Why do sellers refuse CIF LC?
Does CIF guarantee product?
Can TTT be done without buyer tank?
Why is TTV more complex than TTT?
Why do some sellers avoid FOB?
Is CIF safe with unknown sellers? (No)
Which method gives fastest delivery? (TTT)
10 Seller Questions
Should seller accept TTT if buyer has no tank? (No)
Should seller accept FOB if buyer has no vessel? (No)
Why avoid CIF for unknown buyers?
Does TTV expose tank information?
Can sellers demand “CIF upfront fee”? (Never)
Which method protects seller the most? (FOB/TTT)
Should seller accept buyer procedure?
Is DTA mandatory for TTT? (Yes)
Should seller provide POP before SPA? (No)
Does CIF require extra insurance? (Yes)
SECTION 6 — Proof & Institutional Credibility
These guidelines reflect standard practices from:
Vitol
Trafigura
Gunvor
Glencore
Mercuria
Shell Trading
TotalEnergies
Terminals:
Vopak
Oiltanking
VTTI
Koole
Maritime law:
Incoterms® 2020
ISPS Security Codes
IBC Rules
Banks:
MT103
MT799
MT760
MT700
This is the global petroleum standard.
SECTION 7 — Professional Call to Action (CTA)
📌 Need Help Choosing the Correct Procedure for Your EN590/Jet A1 Deal?
NNRV Trade Partners provides:
Full procedural analysis (TTT/TTv/FOB/CIF)
Contract structuring
SPA & POP validation
Compliance alignment
SWIFT workflow guidance
Seller & refiner due diligence
Buyer protection for all transactions
📩 info@nnrvtradepartners.com
🌐 www.nnrvtradepartners.com
Mini FAQ (5 Key Questions)
Which procedure is safest in 2025?
TTT → Tank-to-Tank.Which is cheapest?
FOB.Which is best for new buyers?
CIF (only if seller is real).Which gives DIP test before payment?
TTT & TTV.Can NNRV verify which procedure is legitimate?
Yes — we specialize in it.
Why Choose NNRV Trade Partners?
Institutional petroleum expertise
Real refinery-aligned sellers
Zero-fraud procedures
Full compliance & SWIFT support
End-to-end deal management
Trusted globally by buyers & sellers
